RSS | Advertise With Us | Blogs | Judaica Gifts  16 Sivan 5769, Monday, June 8, 2009 22:10 IST |
Web JPost.com 
Home Headlines Iranian Threat Jewish World Opinion Business Real Estate Local Israel Blogs Arts & Culture Français Classifieds
Israel Middle East International Health & Sci-Tech Features Travel Cafe Oleh Magazine Sports Israel Guide Subscribe
Specials
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers a 20% discount on online reservations
Think Healthy
Minerals Dead Sea cosmetics, special offers online!
The Best Jewish Charity
Learn how Efrat saved 30,000 lives of Jewish children
Tamir Rent a car
Car rental in Israel, special prices
Find love at JChuppah.com
Use your mouse to find your spouse!
Israel guide
Your guide to Israel
Green Israel
Protecting Israel's environment
The future of music
Global community of music makers discover new music
JPost.com » Opinion » Op-Ed Contributors » Article
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

The settlements canard


Print Subscribe
Toolbar
+ Recommend:
facebook del.icio.us reddit newsvine fark
What's this?

Decrease text size Decrease text size
Increase text size Increase text size

Obama the Humble declares there will be no more "dictating" to other countries. We should "forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions," he told the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told Al-Arabiya, America will henceforth "start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating." An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone - Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity.

Ma'aleh Adumim

Ma'aleh Adumim
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimksi

As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: "a stop to settlements - not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions." What's the issue? No "natural growth" means strangling to death the thriving towns close to the 1949 armistice line, many of them suburbs of Jerusalem, that every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining. It means no increase in population. Which means no babies. Or if you have babies, no housing for them - not even within the existing town boundaries. Which means for every child born, someone has to move out. No community can survive like that.

The obvious objective is to undermine and destroy these towns - even before negotiations.

To what end? Over the last decade, the US government has understood that any final peace treaty would involve Israel retaining some of the close-in settlements - and compensating the Palestinians accordingly with land from within Israel itself.

That was envisioned in the Clinton plan in the Camp David negotiations in 2000, and again at Taba in 2001. After all, why turn towns to rubble when, instead, Arabs and Jews can stay in their homes if the 1949 armistice line is shifted slightly into the Palestinian side to capture the major close-in Jewish settlements, and then shifted into Israeli territory to capture Israeli land to give to the Palestinians?

This idea is not only logical, not only accepted by both Democratic and Republican administrations for the last decade, but was agreed to in writing in the letters of understanding exchanged between Israel and the United States in 2004 - and subsequently overwhelmingly endorsed by a concurrent resolution of Congress.

Yet the Obama State Department has repeatedly refused to endorse these agreements or even say it will honor them. This from a president who piously insists that all parties to the conflict honor previous obligations.

The entire "natural growth" issue is a concoction. It's farcical to suggest that the peace process is moribund because a teacher in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem is making an addition to her house to accommodate new grandchildren - when Gaza is run by Hamas terrorists dedicated to permanent war with Israel and when Mahmoud Abbas, having turned down every one of Ehud Olmert's peace offers, brazenly declares that he is in a waiting mode - waiting for Hamas to become moderate and for Israel to cave - before he'll do anything to advance peace.

IN HIS MUCH-HERALDED "Muslim world" address in Cairo Thursday, Obama declared that the Palestinian people's "situation" is "intolerable." Indeed it is, the result of 60 years of Palestinian leadership that gave its people corruption, tyranny, religious intolerance and forced militarization; leadership that for three generations - Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1947, Yasser Arafat in 2000, Abbas in December 2008 - rejected every offer of independence and dignity, choosing destitution and despair rather than accept any settlement not accompanied by the extinction of Israel.

In the 16 years since the Oslo Accords turned the West Bank and Gaza over to the Palestinians, their leaders - Fatah and Hamas alike - built no schools, no roads, no courthouses, no hospitals, no institutions that would relieve their people's suffering. Instead they poured everything into an infrastructure of war and terror, all the while depositing billions (from gullible Western donors) into their Swiss bank accounts.

Obama says he came to Cairo to tell the truth. But he uttered not a word of that. Instead, among all the bromides and lofty sentiments, he issued but one concrete declaration of new American policy: "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements," thus reinforcing the myth that Palestinian misery and statelessness are the fault of Israel and the settlements.

Blaming Israel and picking a fight over "natural growth" may curry favor with the Muslim "street." But it will only induce the Arab states to do like Abbas: sit and wait for America to deliver Israel on a platter.

Which makes the Obama strategy not just dishonorable but self-defeating.

- The Washington Post Writers Group

RATE THIS ARTICLE
Print Subscribe
Toolbar
+ Recommend:
facebook del.icio.us reddit newsvine fark
What's this?
Post comment | Terms | Report Abuse
47. To Oklahoman, the Raper of Native American Land;
Ben - Israel (06/08/2009 21:03)
46. Kraut... pls. correct yourself!
Muhammad - United States (06/08/2009 20:40)
45. On natural growth
Boris - Canada (06/08/2009 20:25)
44. Mike - Germany #21: What impeded the "Palestinian" State when the West Bank and all the walled City of Jerusalsem and all of Gaza WERE IN ARAB HANDS.
Joshuah - (06/08/2009 20:24)
43. No such thing as "refugee camps" or "settlements"
Jesse Socher - Israel (06/08/2009 20:15)
42. To #26 "Oklahoman" -- YOU'RE the one who's guilty of land theft
Y. Kreminsky - Israel (06/08/2009 19:47)
41. Focus on the settlements = psychological "displacement"
Former Belgian - Israel and USA (06/08/2009 19:32)
40. Most of these posts are ful of sh.. because...........and so is Mr. Obama, Ms. Clinton & Mr. Emmanuel
Jordan is Palestine - Jordan is Palestine (06/08/2009 19:04)
39. to #9 You are correct
JimO - USA (06/08/2009 19:00)
38. #32 You are wrong. It was Israel that launched war in 48 and 67
jens - denmark (06/08/2009 19:00)
37. The American Mufti dictates the settlement terms: Obama's ALKA SELTZER moment in time.
Jo Ellen Davey Cohen - USA (06/08/2009 18:49)
36. Palestinians in Gaza ONLY
Jon the Baptist - Brooklyn (06/08/2009 18:43)
35. What Mr. Krauthammer tells us is false for at least three reasons:
Jozef - USA (06/08/2009 18:32)
34. "Natural growth" a diversion from the real problem
Observer - US (06/08/2009 18:12)
33. the canard
raffy1956 - united States (06/08/2009 18:06)
32. To you "No Settlement" people: Was the migration of citizens of Arab countires to British-occupied Palestine ILLEGAL? They are todays "Palestinians"
Nachman - (06/08/2009 17:06)
31. 3rd WORLD CHIP
Dwayne - USA (06/08/2009 16:40)
30. Warning to Jews: STOP having babies!
Gnarlodious - Santa Fe (06/08/2009 16:32)
29. Illegal settlements have to go, no matter what.
jens - denmark (06/08/2009 12:25)
28. Israel you must stand aginst US aggression - politically if not militarily!
Chris - USA (06/08/2009 12:22)
27. The arabs are truly a unproductive lot! They have yet to build modern, functional, world-leading,world-class societies! NET DRAIN on the world!
ed - USA (06/08/2009 11:43)
26. settlements are illegal and illigitimate
Oklahoman - (06/08/2009 11:42)
25. Obama: Manifest Destiny for Muslims, Trail of Tears for Jews
Eitan - Israel (06/08/2009 11:41)
24. The settlements are illegal and a result of a Mussolinization and a hyper-superiority-complex cultivated 42 years in euphopric, unrealistic Israel ..
Ruben Siedner - Germany (06/08/2009 10:55)
23. Truths and Consequences
Hofikoman - USA (06/08/2009 10:48)
22. Use of Force
Gerard - France (06/08/2009 10:38)
21. The "settlements" sole objective is to preventr a Pali state.
Mike - Germany (06/08/2009 10:27)
20. exagerration
Jacov - Israel (06/08/2009 10:09)
19. the "no babies" canard
C. Sofer - (06/08/2009 10:04)
18. Illegal Settlements
Husam - (06/08/2009 10:03)
More...
eTeacher
Hertz
JPost.com
eTeacher
KKL Picture of the week
Got a Question?
Have a question about something in this story? Ask it here and get answers from other users like you.

 
 
© 1995 - 2009 The Jerusalem Post. All rights reserved.    About Us | Media Kit | Exclusive Content | Advertise with Us | Subscribe | Contact Us | RSS
The online edition of The Jerusalem Post – JPost.com – provides first class news and analysis about Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world. Whether news about Iran, Gaza, Syria, Fatah, Hamas or Hezbollah, JPost.com covers the burning issues of the Middle East and the Israeli-Arab conflict.