The Bangladeshi Hindus and What we
can do to Save Them.
Address to Jagriti by Dr. Richard L.
Benkin
Cerritos, California
October 2, 2010
Bangladesh’s Hindu population is
dying. This is not opinion or the ravings of an ideologue: It is a fact. At the
time of India’s partition in 1948, they made up a little less than a third of
East Pakistan’s population. When East Pakistan became Bangladesh in 1971,
Hindus were less than a fifth; thirty years later, less than one in ten; and
reliable estimates put the Hindu population at less than eight percent today.
Professor Sachi Dastidar of the State University of New York estimates that
over 40 million Hindus are missing from the Bangladeshi census.[1]
Still having trouble wondering where
this is going? Take a look at Pakistan where Hindus are down to one percent or
Kashmir where they are almost gone. Take a look at the future of Bangladesh’s
Hindus if we do not act.
Just to be clear, other Bangladeshi
minorities are in distress, including the Amadiyya, Chakmas, and others, but my
focus is the Bangladeshi Hindus for several reasons. First, I am only one person and—as much as I
wish I could—I am unable to take on every worthy human rights cause. Second, Hindus are much more numerous than
the other minorities, so there are many more people at risk. Third, there are implications for India that
are not there for the others, which makes this a more dangerous situation, while
not more worthy of our attention.
That Bangladeshi Hindus are
disappearing is one irrefutable fact.
Want another? For years, we have
received report after report documenting anti-Hindu incidents there;
“incidents” including murder, gang rape, assault, forced conversion to Islam,
child abduction, land grabs, and religious desecration. And while Bangladeshi
officials might object that the perpetrators were non-state actors, government
culpability rests, at the very least, on the fact that it pursues very few of
these cases and punishes even fewer perpetrators. Their excuses have not
stopped the killing. In fact, successive Bangladeshi governments—whether the
openly Islamist BNP, the civilian or military caretaker, or the supposedly
pro-minority Awami League—all have been passive bystanders, failing—or
refusing—to exercise their sovereign responsibility to protect the life and
security of all their citizens; and thus they have sent radical Islamists and
common citizens alike a clear message that these acts can be undertaken with
impunity.[2]
And yet, in this topsy-turvy world,
it is WE who have to prove that there is something wrong. One would expect
justice to demand that the BANGLADESHIS explain why they should not be charged
with complicity in eliminating an entire people numbering in the tens of
millions. That very presumption should tell us why we cannot rest until WE stop
this atrocity—completely and forever!
Perhaps that is due in large part to
the second irrefutable fact. With all
the documented incidents, with all the murders, rapes, and government tolerated
attacks still going on, we have seen nothing about it in the mainstream
media—which leads me to a question I ask a lot.
“Are my sources that much better than CNN’s?” To be sure, many reports are exaggerated or
contain inaccurate information—an occupational hazard in chasing down human
rights violations. But at the same time,
my own sources on the ground often visit the scene of alleged atrocities and
report back what can be verified and in some cases what cannot. So, again, I ask “Are my resources that much better than CNN’s?” Until CNNs of this world, or for that matter The Times of India stop their studied
ignorance of this ongoing human rights travesty, governments in Bangladesh and
elsewhere will deem that they can engage in these things without anyone
caring.
Why governments and not the
radicals? Because I have spoken with
hundreds of Bangladeshi Hindu refugees living in largely illicit colonies
throughout North and Northeast India. In describing the attacks that forced
them to leave their ancestral homes, they made it very clear that their
attackers were not necessarily radicals, but neighbors; common, everyday
Muslims; not radicals or “bad” people. They also reported with near unanimity
that when they went to the police and other officials for help, they were
advised to drop the subject and “get out of Bangladesh.” In 2009, I interviewed
a family that crossed into India only 22 days earlier. They told me about an
uncle being killed, the father beaten, and their small farm invaded by a large
number of “neighbors.” I also looked into the eyes of their 14-year-old
daughter as she talked about being gang raped. Who did it? Not al Qaeda or even
Jammat; but simply Muslims who lived in the area and knew they could have their
way with the family, seize their land, and get away with it.[3]
And that is chilling because history
has shown that the most “successful” cases of genocide and ethnic cleansing
occur when a small cadre of true believers incites average citizens to engage
in heinous acts against a targeted minority that they otherwise would not dream
of committing. There might be no Gestapo or Janjaweed in Bangladesh,
but its Hindu community is facing a similar process of destruction at the hands
of the Bangladeshi majority.
In fact, it is even worse; because
albeit too late, the civilized world eventually heard the cries coming out of
Nazi Europe, Rwanda, and Darfur. As difficult as it was getting to that point,
it is even more difficult getting the world to see an atrocity without
concentration camps that has been going on for decades. When was the last time
Amnesty International protested this; or the UN Human Rights Commission; or
anyone else? What about the United States, or India? Never; and it is our
responsibility to make sure they do. Because if we do not, no one else will,
count on it, and we will see an end to the Bangladeshi Hindus in our lifetime!
So, how do we do it? First, recognize
that the mere fact that our cause is just does not mean people will support us.
They have not so far, and nothing lately has indicated that is changing. We
have to change things ourselves. Second, understand that justice will not come
because people finally “see the light,” but as the result of many small
victories that make it impossible for the world to continue ignoring what we
know is happening to the Hindus of Bangladesh. That means with all due respect
that we do not need to hear from groups and individuals—me included—about how
hard they have worked for this cause. Let us not confuse effort with
results. Human lives hang in the balance! Whatever they have done, it
has not stopped the murders, rapes, and expulsions; it has not stopped the
progressive de-Hinduization of East Bengal and Islamization
of West Bengal. We have to move forward with a new dynamic—one that is
practical and action-oriented; and one that demands commitment from each of us.
As an American, I look first to my own
country.
The Bangladeshis have at least four
pressure points the United States can push: trade, economic cooperation, UN
peacekeeping troops, and its image as a democratic and moderate Islamic nation.
Let me give you two quick examples of what I mean. I was in Dhaka during the
2007 coup. Most people think it occurred because of unrest over the BNP’s
rigging the elections; but that is not what happened. There was a lot of street
violence when I arrived there, and every western democracy was calling for the
elections to be postponed; but the military had no intention of moving until
someone got the UN to weigh in and threaten to review Bangladesh’s
participation in peacekeeping missions. Bangladesh contributes more UN
peacekeeping troops than any other country—almost 11,000 at this moment, just a
little more than Pakistan.me[4] Besides losing the receipts vital to their
economy if the program is cancelled, the very thought of 11,000 young, angry,
unemployed, and armed men is enough to scare the pants off anyone—even enough
to cause a coup. If anything, Bangladesh is more vulnerable now.
In another case, Bangladesh’s
notorious Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) abducted a colleague of mine in
Dhaka—and we know that RAB’s abductees often have a habit of “disappearing.”
So, I called the Bangladeshi ambassador to remind him that I helped stop
several attempts at awarding Bangladesh tariff relief and would do so again,
then added that if my colleague was not released unharmed and soon, “there will
be a shit storm that you cannot even imagine.” But, you see, right after that I
called several Capitol Hill offices that have supported this cause and within
the next 45 minutes, the embassy received angry inquiries from at least six of
them, including some with responsibility for trade and appropriations. Needless
to say, my colleague was freed unharmed after, as he told me, “higher ups”
called the RAB commander.
Understand; this is not about me but
about a good plan and organization and what they can do. In both instances,
material interest not justice convinced the Bangladeshis to act, and if it
worked then, it will work now to save Bangladesh’s Hindus.
Our problem is we lack focus. People come to events like this, get excited,
but leave not knowing quite what to do.
Here are examples of what each of us can
do:
Support my efforts for Congressional hold hearings on the ethnic
cleansing of Bangladesh’s Hindus. We have several interested parties and at least one
verbal okay; but the key will be calling our representatives and Senators after
the new Congress takes office in January.
If you can help, and even better, if you can be part of a call chain,
give me your contact information.
Using the same methods, help us
continue to block attempts to award Bangladesh tariff relief or other trade
benefits until that country observes decent human rights standards—and if any of you know the Bangladeshis, this time talk is not
enough. We have been doing this
successfully for over five years, but it only takes one lapse for these victims
to lose one of the most important tools for putting an end to the
atrocities. The same methods can be
successful in other areas like appropriations.
Congressman Mark Kirk, now running for the US Senate from Illinois, inserted
conditional language that can be used at any time to turn up the heat on
Bangladesh.
Ask candidates for Congress and the Senate if they will support these
efforts and cast your vote accordingly. This is big now, and it will be
bigger in two years.
And engage Bangladesh. The Bangladeshis are not bad people; their actions are not
ideological. Their leaders face the
same—often competing—pressures that others do.
They can be part of the solution and not part of the problem. But it will never happen if (1) we write them
off as evil or (2) give them what they want from us without being tough on
matters like this.
There is something else everyone can
do. Last year, I helped found a human rights organization, Forcefield. Unlike
Amnesty International and the rest, it is not “agenda-driven.” That is, we are
not tied to any leftist ideology, network of supporters, or “flavor of the
week” issues. And we specifically are NOT anti-Israel. We are recognized by the
governments of the United States and India; and unlike the others, we are
committed to stop the ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Bangladesh and hopefully
help persecuted minorities from Kashmir, Pakistan, and elsewhere by bringing
this to the world’s attention.
Our efforts include my human rights
missions to South Asia; a documentary about the Bangladeshi Hindus that we
expect to be a call for action; and an online newspaper to bring Americans and
others solid information about what is happening in South Asia. We have various
professionals ready to participate, victims ready to testify, and
correspondents standing by in the key areas of India to bring Americans news
that CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News never cover; news I never see it in my morning Chicago
Tribune, the Washington Post or the New York Times; even
though it is about the international jihad that threatens us all.
We need funds to do these
things. Donations are fully
tax-deductable, and our credentials are available for inspection. There are
envelopes in the back for donations, as well as forms for credit card donations.
You can also help through our web site, http://www.forcefieldnow.org, and click the “Donate” button. Every penny you give will
help stop the atrocities we know are happening.
Joseph Stalin[5]
is said to have remarked, “One death is a tragedy, a million deaths a
statistic.” That 14-year-old rape victim—that child—I met was no
statistic, and God help us if we make her one!
[1] Population statistics taken from the census of Pakistan (1948), and Bangladesh (1974 and 2001). Also see Dastidar, Sachi G.; Empire’s Last Casualty: Indian Subcontinent’s Vanishing Hindu and other Minorities. (Kolkata: Firma KLM Private Limited, 2008.
[2] See for example, incidents in the monthly newsletter of the Bangladesh Hindu, Buddhist, Christian Unity Council available at http://www.bhbcuc-usa.org/index.html. The Hindu American Foundation has documented these atrocities in successive annual reports, entitled Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights [followed by a specific year]; copyright Hindu American Foundation. For instance, 2007, pages 5-21; 2008, pages 3-15. They also are available at the Hindu American Foundation web site, http://www.hafsite.org. Global Human Rights Defence investigates and reports on human rights violations against Bangladeshi Hindus at http://ghrd.org. Click “countries” and then “Bangladesh.” The first and third organizations have also worked with me in providing evidence of anti-Hindu activities in Bangladesh.
[3] This information came from recorded and unrecorded interviews I had with Bangladeshi Hindu refugees, living in mostly illegal colonies in the Indian states of West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhan, from 2008-2010. The 14-year old rape victim related the story to me in an encampment in North Dinajpur near the Bangladesh border in March 2009.
[4] Figures come from the United Nations itself, Contributors to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, and the August figures can be found at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/contributors/2010/aug10_1.pdf.
[5] Elizabeth Knowles, editor, Oxford Dictionary of Modern Quotations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 301. Attributed to Joseph Stalin.