Print this pagePrint this page.

Please Help New English Review
Search by author:

by Title:

by Keyword or ISBN:


Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
The New English Review Symposium 2009 Booklet - Understanding the Jihad in Israel, Europe and America
Geert Wilders: Why I Am In America Fighting For Free Speech
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
Monday, 8 February 2010
Benkin: Pakistan breaks off India talks on Mumbai attacks


Dr. Richard L. Benkin, reports  from Delhi about the abrupt breakoff in talks between Pakistan and India about the jihad against innocents in Mumbai in November 2008 perpetrated by terrorist group Lashkar e Taiba will allegations about logistical support from elements on Pakistan's intelligence service- the ISI.  This has thrown into serious doubt whether any joint talks will be productive. To the contrary, Pakistan may be in the dock of world opinion about being an enabler of islamic terrorism in south Asia.  What follows is Dr. Benkin's report.

_____________________________________________________________

(Delhi, February 8) “Pakistan Shows its True Colours,” screamed angry headlines here this morning after Pakistani Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi abruptly and defiantly refused to schedule talks with India about the 2008 terrorist attacks on Mumbai and the countries’ longstanding dispute over Kashmir. Those attacks left 173 people dead. The terrorist group, Lashkar e Taiba, has claimed responsibility for the attacks, which shook this nation of over a billion people.
 
It has also long been acknowledged that Lashkar e Taiba has been given safe haven in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan where they have been allowed to operate with relative impunity. All but one of the Mumbai attackers were Pakistani, and it is also suspected that Pakistani intelligence (ISI) provided them with logistical and other support on their trip by sea from Karachi, Pakistan, to Mumbai on India’s west coast. Although Pakistan charged several members of the terrorist group in the attack, they are seen as cosmetic, especially in light of Pakistan’s refusal to cooperate with India in bringing the terrorists to justice. There had been some positive movement in this crisis with the two nations agreeing to hold talks this month; but today’s heated rhetoric has heightened tensions again.
 
Pakistan issued an angry and defiant rebuke to India’s suggestion of talks on the 18th or 25th of February.   In refusing the offer, Queshi vowed that Pakistan “will never bow to India.” In a strident and rambling speech, Queshi laid blame for the growing crisis between these two nuclear powers entirely at India’s feet, re-writing recent history and claiming that Pakistan is the victim in this drama. He alleged that it was only Pakistan’s “bold stance” that brought India to the negotiating table after it, according to Qureshi threatened to cut relations between the two nuclear powers. He also made unsubstantiated and outrageous accusations that India orchestrated the high profile terrorist attacks on Sri Lankan cricketers in Pakistan last March and is cooperating with the Taliban to de-stabilize Pakistan. 
 
India responded through Foreign Minister P. Chidambaram that the refusal is a provocation that threatens dialogue between the two traditional rivals. He also referred to Lakshar e Taiba and other terror groups as “representatives of forces of darkness [that are] implacably opposed to India.” He also vowed that “India will defeat them” wherever they are. The media was even more strident, expressing outrage at Pakistan’s unexpected refusal of dialogue “after India bent over backwards” despite the Islamic country’s coddling of terrorists responsible for the loss of Indian life.
 
Sources here, both inside and outside of the intelligence community attribute Pakistan’s defiance in part on a “changed atmosphere… based in part on Obama’s policies.” The sources have said that the United States is now seen as “not having the stomach” to opposed Islamic terrorists or especially the countries that support them. “This,” more than one said, “is the result of your appeasement.”
 
At this point, the next steps by both India and Pakistan are unclear.

Posted on 02/08/2010 2:01 AM by Jerry Gordon and Dr. Richard Benkin
Comments
No comments yet.
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28       

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed